
(Vol. 2, No. 1 - Winter 1998)
Back to index
Teacher Talk
Read the rubric and the student work
Seventh grade teachers at Williams Middle School are gathered around a table
in the library, scrunched up in the junior-sized wooden chairs. The long,
low table is covered with paper, drinks and snacks. The moderator calls
the group to order and reviews the rules or "protocol" the group
will use to discuss a teacher's assignment and a piece of work produced
by one of her students.
The handout includes two poems about Fall, a "rubric" or guide
intended to let students know what they must do to earn a certain grade
(1-4, with 4 the highest mark) and an
actual 7th grade student paper written by "Jackie."
As the presenter passes around copies of the work, she describes the purpose
of the assignment: to help students practice a language arts "open
response question" -- the kind of question students must answer on
the state KIRIS examinations. For most of the teachers, it's the first time
they've ever sat together and critiqued an assignment created by another
teacher.
The purpose of the activity is to help teachers reflect on why they ask
students to perform a particular task, how well they've designed the task,
and what they expect to get in return. This group "examination of student
work" can also provoke conversations about "how good is good enough"
and what standards teachers use to measure student achievement.
Here's just part of the teachers' conversation:
1st Teacher: I was sort of confused when I read the
rubric. You said give an example. But I wasn't clear whether you meant
an example from our own experience or from the poems.
Presenter: I wanted more added insights.
1st Teacher: What does that mean? What more could she have
given?
Presenter: Yeah, I know. My expectation isn't clear.
2nd Teacher: She did exactly what she was asked to do by
the rubric. She gave good examples.
3rd Teacher: It's a 4 in my book.
4th Teacher: No, it's a 3.
5th Teacher: Yeah, a 3. Too many spelling errors.
4th Teacher: A 4 almost just has to make you go "wow!"
3rd Teacher: I go by the rubric and she met the rubric.
It's a 4.
Presenter: I do think there's a weakness in the rubric.
It didn't draw out what I wanted. She didn't give me the insights I wanted.
3rd Teacher: She said she thought it was fun and it was
sad. What else do you want? I think a 4 would be (a good grade) for our
kids at Williams. That would sustain them.
Assistant Principal: Making the rubric fit their abilities
may make some sense in the short term, but if we don't show them what a
4 really is-what the standard really is-then we're doing them a disservice.
You're not going to have a Williams-level rubric on the KIRIS test.
Presenter: If we can get them to answer the question we
ask, we're pretty far ahead, and she did answer the question. But I appreciate
what's been said. When you look at the (assignment I gave) through the eyes
of a 7th grader, I can see that she probably did what I asked her to do.
Another Teacher: That raises another question, which is
how do the students know what a good paper looks like? Your rubric says
that a 4 has "excellent" examples, and a 3 has "relevant"
examples. What's the difference? How do they know the difference? And you
say they must show "an understanding of the question" but you
really don't ask a question.
5th Teacher: You would almost need to show them what a
"4" paper looked like.
Presenter: It would be interesting to do this with your
7th graders, and maybe change the rubric to make it more clear, and see
what you get. I would really like to get to a point where the kids develop
the rubric themselves which could help them understand what a good paper
is.
Moderator: We're out of time. I have seen this discussion
done with a smaller group. With a smaller group and with more time, you
can dig in even deeper. As you can see, this process really makes us think
about the work we ask students to do. Thanks to everyone.
To eavesdrop on another
group of middle school teachers talking about their assignments and student
work, visit this MiddleWeb page