
Dr. Teacher
(Editor's Note: Judy Willis practiced neurology for 20 years before deciding
to become an elementary school teacher. These two articles, versions of
which have been published in the Los Angeles Times, describe the reasons
for her decision, share her reflections on the state of American public
education and teacher training, and recount her early experiences as a student-teacher.
)
Changing Careers Seemed So Right,
So Unreasonable, and So Impractical
Most of us do not welcome predawn phone calls. That certainly was the case
with me during my 20 years as a neurologist. There usually was another physician
on the other end of the line requesting my expertise in treating a patient
critically ill with a stroke, unremitting convulsions, acute encephalitis
or a multitude of other catastrophes.
Early last year, however, something changed. I would awaken in the person
and look at the silent telephone. If there was a call, I'd reach for it
before the second ring. Not because every second could count in a neurologic
emergency, but because it might be Sue or Sharon calling to see if I'd like
to ... substitute teach.
Now, some 18 months later, I have not completely traded in my stethoscope
for a seating chart. But I have begun the transformation from physician
to full-time elementary school teacher.
I did not deliberately set out to discover a new career. I was not in any
mid-life crisis. It was simply a matter of one thing leading to another
after I found myself with several free days a month despite my medical commitments
and the demands of caring and chauffeuring my 10-year-old daughter.
During her first two elementary school years, I volunteered along with many
other parents as a weekly classroom helper. Some teachers had me grade papers
or set up supplies for the weekly art projects. Others saw my enthusiasm
for working with the children and let me direct reading and math groups,
help young creative writers find their muses or assist budding scientists
in setting up experiments.
Then California's class size reduction program created more classes--and
a need for more teachers. I obtained a credential to be an emergency sub.
By then, I was following by heart. Why, I wondered, was it more exhilarating
to teach a child the parts of the brain than to use that knowledge to diagnose
and treat a patient? Surely, my expertise was critical as a neurologist.
But when I shared it with the children, magic happened. I fell in sync with
their natural curiosity, and creativity.
My scientific curiosity, at least outside of my area of specialization had
become dormant. It was rekindled by the children's probing questions. That
impetus was missing in my medical practice.
Each time I would leave a school after a day in class, I began to doubt
one of the principles of physical science I had memorized in my premed studies:
how the laws of gravity precluded spontaneous levitation. Now it seemed
as if I was floating from the classroom to my car, my feet never touching
the ground.
It had been years since I had that feeling about medicine. So much had changed
in the 20 years since I had graduated from UCLA Medical School.
Gone were the days when I could spend two hours getting to know a new patient
as a person. The constraints put on me by insurance and government restrictions
required that I see more in less time. Neurological diseases are often complex,
unpredictable--and progressive. I needed time to explain the potential benefits
and the limitations of medications, surgery or therapy. This time was no
longer available. I had enjoyed collaborating with my patients, hearing
their concerns, considering their unique situations. But those opportunities
were fading, replaced by hurried answers and minimal collaboration.
The decision to change careers seemed so right to me. Yet so unreasonable
and impractical, as well.
How could I cut my salary to 20% of what I had been earning and not be unfair
to my husband and family? What right did I have to another University of
California funded graduate education? How could I take a spot sought by
students half my age who were finishing college and seeking admission to
teaching programs that would place them in careers they could continue for
four decades?
I started my soul-searching by talking for hours with Paul, my best friend
and husband of 28 years. We had met in college and attended medical school
and residencies as husband and wife. We had shared a private neurology practice
in Santa Barbara. When we sold our practice to devote time to Alani, our
new -- and second -- daughter whom we adopted as an infant from Korea in
1988, the plan was for us to alternate being the working parent and the
at-home parent. This rotation worked well for the first ten years with both
of us enjoying our time as the full-time parent. Now it was my turn to be
doing full time neurology and Paul's turn to cut back.
On the plus side, our oldest daughter was off at college. Alani was growing
up herself and was ``homework independent,'' able to do it on her own. And
my mother, Norma, moved to Santa Barbara this year and had generously taken
over driving her to after-school activities, friends houses and cultural
events.
Paul helped me realize that Alani would not suffer if I was not with her
every day after school. But it was harder for me to accept his offer to
assume complete financial responsibility for our family.
We had already made the life-style changes to enable us to live on a single
income during our years of alternating working. If I became a teacher, though,
Paul would not be able to take his scheduled time off. He would need to
carry on full time for years.
Still, he insisted that I follow my dream.
But what about my own sense of identity? Being a physician carries a status
that is unfortunately not extended to elementary school teachers. Would
I regret that loss?
Of course, I did not plan to leave my ``old self'' behind. My knowledge,
experiences and strengths as a physician could be assets in the classroom.
Elementary school is a critical time in the development of feelings about
science. I hope to communicate the essence of science and validate its importance
by dramatically connecting it to life and our planet.
It is well documented that American students have not scored competitively
against their peers in other nations in science testing. And more than 80%
of elementary school teachers are women-- women whom society and their own
teachers have conditioned to dislike science or to feel that they cannot
do it. It is not surprising, then, that the majority of these teachers spend
less than two hours a week instructing science.
The gender gap in science and math has been attributed to peer pressure
to conform to sex-role expectations in career choice, limited contact with
female role models and unconscious teacher bias. As a physician working
as a teacher, I hope to break that cycle.
Even as a parent helper in the classroom, I asked the children and teachers
to call me Dr. Willis, not Ms. or Mrs. My purpose was to raise their awareness
about women scientists and physicians. It seemed to work. Although the students
whose teachers I substituted for might not remember my last name, they would
frequently call across the play ground, ``Hi lady brain doctor. I remember
what you taught me about the frontal lobe. Look, it's under here! Right?''
Whenever I substitute taught, I brought a model of the brain with me. No
matter what the grade level, from kindergarten to sixth, I would use it
to stimulate a science exploration. I would not mention the brain but someone
always asked about it. More often than not, the kids would cluster around
it giddy with questions and exclamations ranging from ``Yuckie'' to ``Man,
that is so cool!''
I would answer some questions and promise that, when the morning's work
was completed, I would help them all become junior neurologists.
Later, I'd ask if they could figure out what purpose it might serve for
the brain to be so wrinkled. After we discussed their answers, I'd give
each child a piece of scrap paper and ask them to make it as small as they
could. Some would fold it, others would crumple, but most would see how
it could fit into a smaller space. We would then discover together that
one possible purpose of the folded brain is to pack more of it into the
hard protective skull.
Experiences like those have shaped what kind of teacher I hope to be. My
ideal would be a democratic classroom where students' passions and concerns
become the focus of explorations. I would love to start with some artifact
a child might bring in and use the students' questions as impetus to take
off on long range investigations incorporating such academic disciplines
as mathematics, science, project directed reading, research techniques,
computer use, art and history.
Unless math and scientific disciplines are seen as tools the student wants
to master, in order to achieve a goal, their studies risk seeming bothersome
or trivial. I once substituted for a class just before the Martin Luther
King holiday. As usual I had the brain. During a discussion of similarities
and differences the children had with Dr. King, I asked them what color
they thought his brain was. Most said black or brown. Not one of the children--who
in this class were white, Asian and Latino_ suggested that his brain would
have been the same color as the model, which they knew was the color of
their brains. It was a powerful discovery for them to see that color is
truly only skin deep.
I know it sounds like trendy eduspeak to talk about multiculturalism, but
what can you say after an episode like that? So in addition to providing
examples which confirm similarities among all human beings, I also hope
to facilitate the type of ``inclusive'' education where the differences
that children bring to the classroom are respected and appreciated. I want
my classroom to reflect the students' range of heritage, not only with respect
to holidays, food and dress, but with regard to heroes, legends, arts and
philosophies.
I imagine that every teacher in training harbors dreams of how he or she
will bring their own creativity to the classroom and have an impact on the
direction of education. My experiences during the first weeks of my program
at the University of California, Santa Barbara have shown me that my being
a physician will carry some clout if I strive to do that.
One classmate, Dan, proudly told his mother how people seem to be entering
education after other successful careers, even as a neurologist. Another
classmate, Michelle, described her triumph when her brother, a medical student
at UC Davis, boasted about the greater importance of his graduate education.
``Yes, one of my classmates went to medical school,'' she retorted, ``but
now ... '' Yet another classmate, Juliet, gave me a high-five me and offered
a daunting proclamation: ``You'll bring more status to the profession of
teaching.''
I understand that my M.D. degree, and the fact that I have chosen to relinquish
its financial rewards, may give me increased credibility with school boards
and governmental agencies. My years as a successful private business woman
(part of private practice is the running of one's own business) will extend
my comfort zone beyond the classroom to the community, where I hope to have
an impact. Voters considering school financing may even give thought to
the fact that if a physician becomes a classroom teacher, their own financial
investment in a school bond vote is all the more appropriate.
Perhaps I can influence how schools can be innovative to remain relevant
to our evolving society, technological advancements and growing global interconnectedness.
Financial and career independence also makes me less vulnerable than most
of my colleagues if I take risks. I will enter a school as a closely supervised
``student teacher'' in September full of the spirit of cooperation and compromise--and
hope to carry that same attitude with me when I get ``my own'' class in
September, 1999. But I will always know that I can, if necessary, take a
stand that is contrary to my principal or superintendent, even if it puts
my job at risk. I will remain licensed and fully current in my medical specialty.
I can return to practice at any time.
So here I am babbling about the future when I'm just one semester into the
Masters in Education Program and still staggering from changes that have
taken place in universities since I last was a student. The price of books
was my first shock--soft covered text books cost over $40. Then there were
the Xeroxed compilations of articles we had to purchase from an off-campus
copy shop at prices up to $36. Back in my student days, teachers simply
handed out copies of articles they assigned.
My greatest confusion occurred when a professor told the class to bring
``scantrons'' to the final exam. I had no idea what she was talking about,
but the others seemed to. They asked questions like ``What size?'' and ``Which
color?'' I later found out that these are the answer sheets for filling
in boxes or bubbles on multiple choice tests. We students were expected
to purchase and bring these forms to the final exam--and practice that stuck
me as a bit like the reported Communist Chinese custom of billing the families
of executed political prisoners for the cost of the bullet.
My classmates are a diverse group, less than half of them just out of college.
Of the 30 or so students I have met, six or seven have children. Two even
have daughters the same age as Alani. What I love about my new colleagues
are qualities I don't see in my comrades in medicine--a sense of optimism,
unpretentiousness, belief in the importance of what they will do, political
and community activism, and a pace of living that includes time for sitting
down for coffee and conversation. My professors so far have also reflected
optimism and commitment. They provide me with insight while also demonstrating
methods of teaching that work best to engage the class and stimulate us
to reflect on our prejudices.
Much of our classwork is collaborative and interactive. The reading materials
provide different philosophies and perspectives for critical thinking rather
than how-to-teach manuals.
The professors encourage me to believe that I can be important and affect
changes at a time in our educational history when change is accelerating.
Marianne D'Emidio-Caston, who teaches the class in Social Foundations of
Education, asked us the ponder the value of public school education. I wrote
that, ``As an educator one of my goals will be to raise public awareness
to understand the enormous value of supporting excellence in public education.
Just because the schools are not all superior now, it does not mean that
it is an unobtainable goal.''
Dr. D'Emidio-Caston who always writes long responses to our papers, did
not belittle my idealism. She wrote, ``I'm glad you've decided to join us.''
Responding to a Higher Calling
It was August 31st, well into a record-breaking heat wave. The stock market
had plummeted over 500 points and I was awash in sweat, wiping summer collections
of mouse feces from shelves and cabinets while Francine Steele, my new cooperating-teacher,
gave me the first of her many pearls of experienced teacher wisdom, "You
just have to keep smiling." As if to confirm her advice a mouse jumped
out of the shelf directly in front of me. I levitated to the top of the
nearest desk, let out a "Yeek" but did it all with a smile on
my face.
This second grade classroom in the oldest public school in Santa Barbara
was to be my student teaching assignment for the next four months. McKinley
School, perched on a hill with a glorious view of the ocean is an exquisite
example of the Spanish architecture that gives Santa Barbara its allure.
Yet the students who would be entering its classrooms in a few days are
not seen in the upscale restaurants or tourist haunts. They come from the
poorest families. Only four of the incoming second graders to my class spoke
English as their primary language.
Yet not once in those first hours at my teaching site did I long for the
air- conditioned comfort and antiseptic cleanliness of my medical office.
I was exactly where I wanted to be and my decision to forsake the practice
of medicine for the life of public elementary school teaching was validated.
Although my desire to enter this new profession at the tail end of my forties
was firm, I was concerned about how professors at the UCSB Graduate School
of Education, classmates who were my daughter's age, and teachers in the
community would respond to a neurologist joining their ranks.
I need not have worried. When my story was told in an August 5th article
in the Los Angeles Times responses from these people were remarkable both
in number and sentiment. The consistent theme was that teaching is considered
a low status profession and having a physician enter the ranks raised the
prestige for all. The most poignant response was from a classmate who said,
"Before reading your article if someone asked what I was going to be
I would say 'just a teacher' and from now on I will leave out the 'just.'
Another classmate thanked me for "being a great role model" while
a professor wrote on my course evaluation, "I am so hopeful about the
classroom becoming a healing space for children when I have contact with
caring, enriching, committed future teachers such as yourself."
Even Dr. Jules Zimmer, Dean of the Graduate School of Education introduced
me to a group at an education conference with the words, "Judy came
to us from a very successful neurology practice, not because she needed
a new job. I like to think that she responded to a higher calling."
Once the anxiety of being accepted by my new cohort was relieved my confidence
grew and I began to wonder if I really needed the education classes required
for a teaching credential. Wasn't I more than qualified to teach?
I had been educated at Vassar, Williams, and UCLA where I listened to thousands
of lectures, took volumes of notes, read hundreds of text books, and aced
innumerable standardized tests. I had been a parent-helper in my daughters'
classrooms for ten years and an elementary school substitute teacher for
two. Surely a physician would know everything about any subject taught in
grades K through 6. Couldn't I just get up in front of a class of elementary
school children and wax brilliantly about any subject in their textbooks?
The answer was clear to me within the first days of my education classes.
Teachers had changed roles from "Sage on the stage to guide on the
side." This transformation was necessary to prepare students to not
only actively acquire knowledge, but to also develop critical analytical
skills to keep pace with the proliferation of information they would confront
during their lifetimes.
Thus the most common materials my classmates and I would see upon entering
our university classrooms were marking pens, poster paper, and other assorted
hands-on manipulative material. Never were our seats in rows, but set around
card tables for four, in a circle for group discussion, or pushed back against
the walls to clear a space for our participation in a music, art, or drama
exercise, or in the human recreation of a math or science principle.
I don't think more than 30 minutes of lecture ever passed before we were
actively involved in pouring beans in two differently shaped cylinders to
predict the association between volume and area or in preparing a diagram
or skit to demonstrate one of Piaget's concepts of child development. It
was like summer camp, and I was enthralled until I realized that now I was
responsible to create these types of learning experiences in my future classrooms.
Gone were visions of my unilateral pontifications. For my birthday I asked
not for the usual earrings or latest laptop. I needed large canvas bags
for carrying creativity-inspiring objects into my classes and a membership
at the local "Art from Scrap" recycling shop for supplies.
One of my favorite exercises was on the day we received our assignments
for student teaching schools. My group of six was given a video camera and
a loaf of white bread and told to return in two hours with a short film.
The only requirement was to include the loaf of bread. Knowing the demographics
of McKinley School and its 90% Latino population, we headed out to Alex's
Cantina near campus and plotted our screenplay.
We wanted to demonstrate our desire to learn and appreciate the culture
of our new students so we filmed our two blondest members sitting in a booth
eating catsup on the white bread. As their conversation grew in insights
about the student population that they would soon serve, they switched to
tortillas and salsa. Next our group of six fed slices of the white bread
into the tortilla making machine and the camera followed as these balls
of bread were transformed into crispy tortillas. Speilberg has nothing to
worry about, but it was a bonding event and helped us begin to face the
anxieties we had about becoming part of a school community that was alien
to our past experiences.
As if to complete the circle of cultural sharing the first thing I discovered
about my second semester placement in Beth Yeager's fifth grade class at
McKinley was that this class, with not a single Jewish member, worked all
year to develop the concepts of community, responsibility, rights and respect
and culminated these inquiries with a trip to the Museum of Tolerance.
I now realize that people like myself who come to teaching from successful
first careers bring special knowledge, experience, understanding of cooperative
skills, and the capacity to connect classroom learning to the real world.
But without the supervision, feedback, theory, and practical techniques
I am receiving in my credential program I would never have become a professional
educator. Teaching is indeed a profession and as such requires unique skills
that can't be faked or picked up along the way. Because of my participation
in a credential program I will not only be a teacher but also a more fulfilled
teacher.
I already know that I've never been more content in my work. Proof of this
came to me when I realized that upon awakening each morning and going through
the usual ritual of slowly orienting myself to "What day is today?"
I am just as happy to ascertain that is as school day as I am to find that
it is a Saturday. What better proof that I love what I am doing?