 |
 |

ELLEN
BERG
Diary #5
I Win the T-Notes War,
But Discover I Can Still Mess Up!
All the sweat and tears I shed and all the gray hair I gained in the last
few weeks with the great T-note Campaign of 2002 was worth it. While I
may have lost a battle or two, in the end I won the war.
This week
there were no puzzled looks, no, "Huh?" when I asked students to take
out their T-notes. Better yet, as we moved on to applying what we had
learned about writing good characters from the reading and our notes,
I asked students to do a web or a chart of the sensory details of a character
we'd encountered, Aunt Tiny. And the kids asked, "Do we have to use a
web, or can we set this up in T-note form?"
Furthermore,
the science teacher reported that many of the students had asked if they
could or should set up their notes for their biome project in T-note form
most notably, the class that gave me the most blank looks throughout
this concept!
Lesson learned:
Don't be afraid to take the time with a concept to be sure students really
learn it. If it is worth teaching, it is worth teaching it well.
One of the greatest
things about this job is my own growth. Each year there are new lessons
to learn about teaching and learning, each year I add something new to my
repertoire. Getting better at what I do is one of the major reasons I still
enjoy teaching so much. I never, ever get bored.
I still
mess up
While I'm
getting better at what I do, I still occasionally need a refresher course.
This past week we have been working on describing our characters' physical
characteristics in ways that show the reader what the character is like
without actually writing a straightforward description.
We looked
at examples from real literature, we created webs (or T-charts) of sensory
details, and we began writing our character sketches, focusing only on
the physical description for the moment. For the most part my students
have been enthusiastic and following along well.
And then I had
to go and mess up.
Last Thursday
and Friday I decided to have students switch papers for peer review and
answer three questions:
1. What questions
do you have about the character? What information is confusing or missing?
2. How can the
author make this piece better? (Word choice, details missing or contradictory,
etc.)
3. What kind
of person does this character seem to be? What makes you think that?
Easy, right?
I explained each question and asked if they had any questions. No hands
raised, no quizzical looks, so I sent them off to work with a partner. I
was sure this would be productive; after all, all they had to do was read
and answer the questions, right?
The noise in
my room was deafening. Behaviors I had never seen from this group of students
during a task erupted. Pencil breaking, name calling, loud talking about
boys and parties, and sharing of Yug-i-oh cards took place. I was dumbfounded.
Thursday night
I spent rationalizing. Thursday's classes were more challenging. They were
lower level. They were too advanced. They just didn't care about learning.
After Friday's
morning class went no better, I knew I had to get off the excuse train.
While updating my Americorps worker about what had transpired in his absence,
the truth came to me. I realized that all of the behaviors I had seen were
symptoms of a problem I could have prevented: My kids didn't understand
what the heck I wanted them to do. While I assumed they understood, I failed
to make concrete a pretty abstract and unfamiliar concept. I forgot to model.
Modeling
is one of the most basic, important tools of teaching practice, yet I
had completely skipped it. What was I, stupid? Not really. I only forgot
that what seems easy for me may in fact not be so easy for my much younger,
less experienced students
I apologized
On Monday
I apologized to my students for messing up. I told them that back in the
days when I first started teaching, I would have gone home and complained
to my husband about them and their behavior during the peer revision activity.
I explained that I was more mature and intelligent now and that I realized
I had made the mistake because I had failed to show them what I meant.
With that
I pulled out my draft of my character, and we answered the three questions
about it together. When I released them to working with a partner, there
was none of the roar or confusion of the week before. Hands raised when
there were questions, and students attacked the task with a new understanding
and dedication.
I hope that
by setting all of this down in a public record that I will finally own this
learning. I can't afford to keep making the same mistakes over and over
again, especially since there are many new mistakes to make and learn from.
Comment
on this diary entry
Read
next week's diary
Read
last week's diary
|
 |
 |